GAME OF THE NAMES: BRANDING IN SMARTPHONE INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Prathamesh Muzumdar The University of Texas at Arlington

Abstract

Brand name and product positioning have been a critical issue in the field of branding, especially for the growing market of smartphones. The booming market has made industry to invest more capital in research and development of more sophisticated devices featuring advanced features from basic calling technology to advance computing. Many companies have developed various technologies differentiating themselves from their competitors. The companies are seen following a particular pattern of updating on particular attributes of their products. The purpose of the research study is to understand the preferences of consumers in an experimental item and main item setup. This study explores the fundamental change in preferences along the basic features of a smartphone and change in purchase intentions due to influence of brand title. The study uses paired sample t test, conjoint analysis, and positioning mapping to address the issue of brand influence in experimental item and main item setup. The study uses the Euclidean distance model to explore the dimensions that define particular brands. Overall the study concludes by proving the effect of brand title on preferences and defining the dimensions along which brands are compared.

Author Biography

Prathamesh Muzumdar, The University of Texas at Arlington

Research Associate, Department of Marketing, The University of Texas at Arlington

References

Farhana, M. (2012). Brand elements lead to brand equity: Differentiate or die. Information

management and business review. 4(2), 223- 233.

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: capitalizing the value of a brand name. New York:

The Free Press.

Erdem, T. & Swait, J. (1998). Brand equity as a signaling phenomenon. Journal of Consumer

Psychology, 7(2), 131-157.

Erdem, T., Swait, J., Broniarczyk, S., Chakravarti, D., Kapferer, J. N., & Keane, M. (1999).

Brand equity, consumer learning and choice. Marketing Letters, 10(3), 301-318.

Kapferer, J. N. (2004). The new strategic brand management: Creating and sustaining brand

equity long term. London: Kogan Page.

Koehn, N. F. (2001). Brand-new: How entrepreneurs earned consumers’ trust from wedgewood

to dell. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Keller, K. L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong

brands. Marketing 233 Research Institute, Report Summary 101-107.

Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand

equity (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Keller, K. L. & Lehmann, D. R. (2006). Brands and branding: Research findings and future

priorities. Marketing Science, 25(6), 740-759.

Klink, R. R. (2001). Creating meaningful new brand names: A study of semantics and sound

symbolism. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 9(2).

Kohli, C. & Labahn, D. W. (1997). Creating effective brand names: A study of the naming

process. Journal of Advertising Research, 37(1), 67–75.

Lerman, D. & Garbarino, E. (2002). Recall and recognition of brand names: A comparison of

word and non word name types. Psychology & Marketing, 19(7/8), 621.

Blackwell, R.D., Miniard, P.W. and Engel, J.F. (2001). Consumer Behavior, The Dryden Press,

Orlando, FL.

Moorthy, S., Ratchford, B.T. and Talukdar, D. (1997). Consumer information search revisited:

theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 23 No. 4, 264-277.

Urbany, J.E., Dickson, P.R. and Wilkie, W.L. (1989). Buyer uncertainty and information search,

Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 No. 2, 208-215.

Kim, M. and Lennon, S.J. (2000). Television shopping for apparel in the United States: effects of

perceive amount of information on perceived risks and purchase intention. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, Vol. 28 No. 3, 301-330.

Elliot, S. and Fowell, S. (2000). Expectations versus reality: a snapshot of consumer experience

with internet retailing. International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 20 No. 5, 323-336.

Alba, J.W. and Hutchinson, J.W. (1987). Dimensions of consumer expertise. Journal of

Consumer Research, Vol. 13 No. 1, 411-454.

Sen, S. and Johnson, E.J. (1997). Mere-possession effects without possession in consumer

choice. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24 No. 2, 105-117.

Kent, R.J. and Allen, C.T. (1994). Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for

advertising: the role of brand familiarity. Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 3, 97-105.

Laroche, M., Kim, C. and Zhou, L. (1996). Brand familiarity and confidence as determinants of

purchase intention: an empirical test in a multiple brand context. Journal of Business

Research, Vol. 37 No. 2, 115-120.

Colombo, R.A. and Morrison, D.G. (1989). Consumer preference formation and pioneering

advantage. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 26 No. 3, 285-298.

Howard, J.A. and Sheth, J.N. (1969). The Theory of Buyer Behavior, Wiley, New York, NY.

Bennett, P.D. and Harrell, G.D. (1975). The role of confidence in understanding and predicting

buyers’ attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 2 No. 2,

-117.

Woodside, A.G. and Wilson, E.J. (1985). Effects of consumer awareness of brand advertising on preference. Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 25 No. 4, 41-48.

Downloads

Published

06-10-2015

How to Cite

Muzumdar, P. (2015). GAME OF THE NAMES: BRANDING IN SMARTPHONE INDUSTRY. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management (JCRM), 10(2). Retrieved from https://jcrm.psgim.ac.in/index.php/jcrm/article/view/402

Issue

Section

Articles